![]() These Linux distros really have come a long way over the last few years, and this one - with the Cinnamon desktop - feels like a very well-sorted operating system indeed. The first thing I want to say is, Linux Mint 18.2 is *great*. I have this all setup as a dual boot option on my otherwise Windows 10-based PC. It comes with GIMP pre-installed, and I added Darktable 2.0.7. I believe I've found one that could work for me.Ī few days ago I installed Linux Mint 17.2, and went through the rather time-consuming (though relatively straightforward) process of upgrading it to 17.3, then 8, and finally 8.2. So don't take it personally - I still want to be able to use DarkTable and I am glad it exists.Since Adobe's recent announcements, I've been trying out a few different alternatives to Lightroom. But the problem is that JPEGs from A77-II are "good enough", and are essentially free in terms of effort invested.Īnyway - I am aware how difficult the situation of DarkTable is to the situation of vendor-provided proprietary RAW developer tools. It might be that I don't have the correct workflow or whatever. The details including sample images can be found in the lensfun-users list archive in the following thread: Īlso, by "matching the in-camera JPEG" I don't mean "getting exactly the same results", but "to get _at least_ as good JPEG as the camera does". For other focal distances, the results might be bad depending on the lens itself. The problem with TCA correction is that lensfun currently supports only the correction when focused to infinity. ![]() I am not sure whether I will be able to do the vignetting profile, though. OK, as I said, I am planning to do the profiling eventually and contribute the data. Once you do though it's much easier to have consistent output from different cameras. That of course means becoming comfortable with the output from the raw conversion. What photographers eventually find out is that if they want consistency in output they just need to forget the camera ever did any conversions at all and just use raw conversions for everything. Even if we did the point of a raw developer is to go back to the raw data and start over. See the manual for how to use that module, it's quite powerful.Īs for matching the in-camera jpeg that will never be possible as we have no idea how the camera processing of each camera works. All of yours should and we can always add new cameras if you provide some simple samples. The noise profiling is usually quite good in darktable if your camera supports profiled denoise. ![]() We really don't and can only figure out issues and improve support for specific cameras/lenses/etc if bug reports are filed and samples provided.Īs for your specific issues, the CA correction may be mis-profiled, try submitting a bug report with samples to lensfun. I'm one of the darktable developers and users seem to assume the open source projects are like Adobe and have access to all the gear to test with. So they usually do not set the white balance, knowing they can try various settings in the postprocessing with exactly the same results. * Matching the in-camera settings: some of my friends use the proprietary RAW development tool for their camera, and the main advantage is, that they can apply the same settings/effects/whatever with the same results as in the camera itself. * Noise reduction: I can get reasonable JPEGs from the camera at ISO 1600, but when the same RAW is developed in DarkTable, the noise is much more visible. The in-camera compensation is close to perfect. * Chromatic aberration correction: LensFun (and thus DarkTable) have profiles for some of my lenses, but I discovered that while it somewhat works when focused to infinity, at 5 meters it severly overcompensates. I have yet to go through creating profiles of my camera and lenses as described at the DarkTable and LensFun sites, but currently I see several problems with DarkTable compared to the native software in the camera itself: Thanks for your offer, I will send you (links to) some image pairs from my gear tomorrow.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |